Talk to the Veterans Crisis Line now
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government

VA Health Systems Research

Go to the VA ORD website
Go to the QUERI website
Publication Briefs

Establishing Appropriate Peer Group Method for Comparing Healthcare Quality

Measuring and reporting healthcare facility performance via clinical measures of quality has become a major strategic initiative in improving the quality of healthcare. Establishing appropriate peer groups can help make equitable comparisons across hospital or healthcare systems, however, peer groups as commonly constructed have several undesirable characteristics. This study sought to develop a methodology for constructing peer groups for VA medical centers. Unlike peer groups based on traditional cluster analysis, this new methodology developed a peer group customized to each medical center by identifying the “nearest neighbor” medical centers, according to distance from each other and selected characteristics for comparison (i.e., patient complexity, patient reliance on VA care, size, community, and environment). Using VA data from FY05, investigators compared the nearest-neighbor peer groupings for 133 VAMCs by the selected characteristics.

Findings show that one of the advantages of the nearest-neighbor method is that the peer groups are more refined, reflecting the multi-dimensional diversity of healthcare providers. Moreover, the nearest-neighbor method incorporates the practical consideration that healthcare facilities or systems may have structural and patient-based differences that cannot be changed, but do affect financial or quality outcomes. Authors suggest that nearest-neighbor peer groups may be more appealing to some researchers and administrators than standard cluster analysis, and thus may strengthen organizational buy-in for financial and quality comparisons.

PubMed Logo Byrne M, Daw C, Nelson H, Urech T, Pietz K, and Petersen L. A method to develop health care peer groups for quality and financial comparisons across hospitals. Health Services Research April 2009;44(2 Pt 1):577-592.

This study was partly funded by HSR&D. Drs. Daw, Urech, Pietz, and Petersen are part of HSR&D’s Houston Center for Quality of Care and Utilization Studies.

Related Briefs

» next 136 Quality Briefs...

What are HSR Publication Briefs?

HSR requires notification by HSR-funded investigators about all articles accepted for publication. These journal articles are reviewed by HSR and publication briefs or summaries are written for a select number of articles that are then forwarded to VHA Central Office leadership to keep them informed about important findings or information. Articles to be summarized are selected by HSR based on timeliness of the findings, interest of leadership, or potential impact on the organization. Publication briefs are written for only a small number of HSR published articles. Visit the HSR citations database for a complete listing of HSR articles and presentations.

Questions about the HSR website? Email the Web Team

Any health information on this website is strictly for informational purposes and is not intended as medical advice. It should not be used to diagnose or treat any condition.