Talk to the Veterans Crisis Line now
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government

VA Health Systems Research

Go to the VA ORD website
Go to the QUERI website
HSRD Conference Logo



2019 HSR&D/QUERI National Conference Abstract

Printable View

4017 — Learning from primary care providers to inform de-implementation of unneeded lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging for new onset low back pain

Lead/Presenter: Andrea Nevedal,  COIN - Palo Alto
All Authors: Nevedal AL (Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System), Lewis E (Program Evaluation Resource Center; Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System), Wu J (Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System) Jacobs J (Health Economics Resource Center; Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System) Lo J (Health Economics Resource Center, VA Palo Alto Health Care System) Illarmo S (Health Economics Resource Center, VA Palo Alto Health Care System) Barnett P (Health Economics Resource Center; Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System)

Objectives:
Clinical practice guidelines suggest that magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine (LS-MRI) is unneeded during the first 6 weeks of new onset low-back pain without red-flag conditions. Despite recommendations, approximately 30% of LS-MRI are unnecessary and this type of advanced imaging is not associated with improved pain, back function, quality of life or mental health. Unneeded LS-MRI costs the U.S. healthcare system about $300 million dollars per year, including $14 million to Veterans Affairs (VA). The factors that lead to unneeded LS-MRI are not known. The purpose of this study was to conduct a qualitative assessment among VA primary care providers (PCPs) to identify potential modifiable factors associated with unneeded ordering which could subsequently be targeted for de-implementation.

Methods:
VA administrative data were used to identify primary care providers (physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners) with higher and lower rates of guideline concordant LS-MRI for new onset low back pain without red-flag conditions in 2016. We conducted 55 semi-structured telephone interviews with 22 higher and 33 lower guideline concordant VA primary care providers and recruited from all 18 VA regional service networks. Open-ended questions focused on environmental, guideline, patient, and provider factors contributing to unneeded LS-MRI. Data were analyzed using directed content analysis and summarized in a matrix to compare differences between high and low guideline concordant provider groups.

Results:
Lower guideline concordant PCPs described environmental factors (lenient radiologist review, patient travel burden, increased time constraints); guideline factors (less familiarity, more disagreement); and provider factors (giving in to patients, seeing value in early scans) that contributed to unneeded LS-MRI. Higher guideline concordant PCPs described environmental factors (diligent radiologist review); guideline factors (greater familiarity, more agreement); and provider factors (not giving in to patients, no value in early scans) that contributed to appropriate LS-MRI. Both PCP groups reported frequent patient pressure for LS-MRI, but they differed in their response to patient pressure.

Implications:
Higher and lower guideline concordant PCPs differed in environmental, guideline, and provider factors, relevant to their decision to order unneeded LS-MRI.

Impacts:
Learning which factors contribute to unneeded LS-MRI will help researchers and administrators develop targeted de-implementation strategies to reduce these scans.