Talk to the Veterans Crisis Line now
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government
Veterans Benefits and Health Care About VA Find a VA Location

VA Health Systems Research

Go to the VA ORD website
Go to the QUERI website

HSR&D Citation Abstract

Search | Search by Center | Search by Source | Keywords in Title

Triadic agreement about advanced cancer treatment decisions: Perceptions among patients, families, and oncologists.

Tulsky JA, Steinhauser KE, LeBlanc TW, Bloom N, Lyna PR, Riley J, Pollak KI. Triadic agreement about advanced cancer treatment decisions: Perceptions among patients, families, and oncologists. Patient education and counseling. 2022 Apr 1; 105(4):982-986.

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.    Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions


Abstract:

OBJECTIVES: When patients make cancer treatment decisions, they consider the needs and preferences of family caregivers and clinicians. We examined how much all three triad members agreed about goals of treatment and caregivers'' influence on decision-making. METHODS: We surveyed 70 triads of patients, caregivers, and oncologists who had recently made an advanced cancer treatment decision. We assessed each triad member''s perception of the goal of treatment and the caregiver''s influence on the decision. Participants also completed scales related to decisional conflict, satisfaction, and regret. RESULTS: In only 28/70 triads (40%), all three agreed on the goal of treatment with the most common goal being to live longer (n  =  22). Whereas patients and caregivers tended to think the goal was to cure or live longer, oncologists were less optimistic. In only 22 triads (31%), all three agreed on how much influence the caregiver had on decision-making. Oncologists tended to underestimate caregiver influence. Patients and caregivers had low decisional conflict (M = 15.40, SD = 4.51; M = 17.09, SD = 6.34, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Advanced cancer treatment decision-making occurs amid incomplete understanding among patients, caregivers, and oncologists. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Confirming agreement about goals of care and influence on treatment decision-making may increase the likelihood of goal-concordant care throughout the illness trajectory.




Questions about the HSR website? Email the Web Team

Any health information on this website is strictly for informational purposes and is not intended as medical advice. It should not be used to diagnose or treat any condition.