Talk to the Veterans Crisis Line now
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government

VA Health Systems Research

Go to the VA ORD website
Go to the QUERI website

HSR&D Citation Abstract

Search | Search by Center | Search by Source | Keywords in Title

Can exercise training improve QOL in heart failure patients? A pilot study

Collins EG, Langbein E, Orebaugh C. Can exercise training improve QOL in heart failure patients? A pilot study. Paper presented at: International Society for Heart & Lung Transplantation Annual Meeting; 1998 Jun 1; Chicago, IL.

Related HSR&D Project(s)




Abstract:

In this pilot study, subjects with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF 40%) completed six-weeks of moderate intensity exercise training to determine if improvements in QOL are associated with increased aerobic capacity. Subjects were 10 males (53-84 yr of age); eight completed exercise training and two served as controls. Baseline EF were 28 13% and 26% for the training (Tgrp) and control (Cgrp) groups respectively. At baseline, no significant differences were found between the two groups. Each subject repeated a symptom limited modified Naughton treadmill test with metabolic and hemodynamic measures, Rand Short Form 36, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire, Cardiac Exercise Self-Efficacy Instrument, and a three-day activity log. Baseline maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) were 18.1 2.8 for the Tgrp and 17.5 ml kg-1min-1 for the Cgrp (range = 16.2 - 18.8). Due to the small sample size and lack of a normal distribution, the Wilcoxon Matched-Pairs Signed-Rank Test was used to analyze the data. An = 0.025 was required for statistical significance. The 8% improvement in VO2max of the Tgrp was not statistically significant (p > 0.025). However, the 19% increase in total treadmill exercise time was significant (p < 0.02). An 8% decline in time and a 7% decline in VO2max were found in the two control subjects. QOL scores are expressed in terms of effect size relative to change (0.20 = small change, 0.50 = moderate change, and > 0.80 = large change). For the Tgrp, a large change was found in the subjects' vitality (energy or pep) from baseline to six-weeks (ES = 0.90). Moderate to small improvements were seen in the subjects' confidence in their ability to exercise (ES = 0.42), their mental health (ES = 0.44), and their overall sense of well-being (ES = 0.33). Due to the small group size, no meaningful interpretation of the Cgrp QOL data could be made. Analysis of the subjects' self-report, three-day activity log revealed an increase in estimated daily energy expenditure. At baseline, subjects utilized 1668 700 kcalsday. After six-weeks of training, subjects were more active, utilizing 2179 997 kcalsday . This difference of 511 kcals more per day translates into a 31% increase in caloric expenditure. Whereas the ability to generalize from the findings of this study is limited by the sample size, it is noteworthy that there was a positive association between the HF patients' perceived QOL and their improvements in exercise tolerance and increased activities of daily living. A randomized clinical trial is underway to further evaluate the strength of this important relationship.





Questions about the HSR website? Email the Web Team

Any health information on this website is strictly for informational purposes and is not intended as medical advice. It should not be used to diagnose or treat any condition.