» Back to Table of Contents
Health care systems are interested in identifying
patients at high risk of hospitalization
or poor outcomes and proactively
improving their care. This high-risk patient
population includes a large proportion
of individuals with mental illness or substance
use disorders. Individuals with serious
mental illness (SMI) have not benefited
from improvements in prevention and
primary care that have reduced mortality
in the rest of the population over recent
decades. While Veterans with SMI have
better medical care and outcomes than
individuals with SMI who do not have access
to VA, substantial disparities remain
between the care of Veterans with and
without SMI.
Evidence indicates that individuals with
SMI have difficulty accessing health care
and managing their complex comorbid
conditions. This population has diminished
quality of life from chronic diseases.
In VA, the overall prevalence of type 2 diabetes
in individuals with schizophrenia, the
hallmark SMI disorder, is 26 percent, while
the rate in individuals with schizophrenia
nationally is 16 percent, and in the general
population it is 5 percent. Also, people
with SMI have significantly elevated rates
of obesity, smoking, and other metabolic
risk factors. More than 60 studies have
found that mortality rates among individuals
with SMI are two to three times greater
than in the general population. When
studied in VA, all-cause mortality risk was
found to be 1.4 for depression, 1.3 for bipolar
disorder, and 1.6 for schizophrenia.
In VA, the number of Veterans with SMI
has risen every year since fiscal year (FY)
1999. Total health care costs for Veterans
with psychosis were approximately $4.6
billion in FY 2008. These total costs represent
an increase of 13 percent from FY
2007 to FY 2008, with the majority of costs
arising from non-psychiatric care.
Although VA provides centrally organized,
comprehensive health care, Veterans with
SMI still have difficulty navigating the
system. Too often, they do not attend appointments
or fail to engage in primary
care treatment, and do not receive valuable
preventive and primary care services. The
VA Primary Care-Mental Health Integration
initiative has addressed Veterans'
mental health conditions by co-locating
mental health clinicians in primary care
settings, and by making care management
services available in these settings for
common psychiatric disorders. This has
focused on patients with depression and
anxiety, with the goal of managing these
patients within primary care, freeing up
specialty mental health services for patients
who need them most.
The next step is to transform the health
care of Veterans with SMI. Some VAs have
co-located primary care clinicians within
specialty mental health settings. However,
this co-location has not been implemented
widely, and researchers have found that it
has inconsistent effects on care processes
and outcomes. Treatment processes, in
particular, need to be improved to address
patients' complex needs. A modest number
of research studies have examined the effectiveness
of care models for improving
the medical care of people with SMI. Models
have included co-location, team-based
care, and facilitated referrals to primary
care. While there have been some positive
effects, implementation has varied, and it
is difficult to know which models are effective.
The few economic studies in this area
have often found models to be cost-neutral
or cost-reducing from the perspective of
the health plan. One particularly promising
team-based model includes medical care
management, in which highly competent
clinicians provide proactive care to a defined
panel of patients. Evidence also supports
the efficacy of collaborative care to
improve treatment for people with SMI.
VA's Patient Aligned Care Team (PACT)
model can include care coordination,
patient-centered care, and use of clinical
data to proactively manage populations.
It seems likely that PACT can be tailored
to meet the needs of Veterans with SMI
by applying the evidence on medical care
management and collaborative care.
VA HSR&D QUERI is supporting a project to
implement and evaluate a specialized PACT
model that meets the needs of individuals
with SMI ("SMI-PACT"). The SMI-PACT
team is led by a primary care provider. Tailoring
of the PACT model includes a smaller
panel size (patient n=500), in line with VHA
Handbook 1101.02 directives for specialty
PACT, allowing an increase in standard visit
length from 20 to 30 minutes. Both the SMIPACT
registered nurse care manager and primary
care provider are trained in the needs of
this population, including frequent outreach
between appointments and aids to support
education around illness self-management. A
psychiatrist consults to the SMI-PACT team.
In a site level-controlled trial, SMI PACT is
being implemented at one medical center,
and compared to existing PACT teams
for people with SMI at two other medical
centers within the same VISN. The project
is studying the effect, relative to usual care,
of SMI-PACT on: provision of appropriate
preventive and medical treatments; patient
health-related quality of life and satisfaction
with care; and medical and mental
health treatment utilization and costs. The
project includes a mixed methods formative
evaluation to strengthen the intervention
and investigate relationships among
organizational context, intervention factors,
and patient and provider outcomes
as well as to identify factors related to successful
patient outcomes. This is one of the
first projects to systematically implement
and evaluate a medical home model for
this population.
- Walker ER, McGee RE, Druss BG. "Mortality in
Mental Disorders and Global Disease Burden Implications:
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis,"
JAMA Psychiatry 2015; 72(4):334-41.
- Chwastiak LA, et al. "Association of Psychiatric
Illness and All-cause Mortality in the National Department
of Veterans Affairs Health Care System,"
Psychosomatic Medicine 2010; 72(8):817-22.
3. Druss BG, von Esenwein SA. "Improving General
Medical Care for Persons with Mental and Addictive
Disorders: Systematic Review," General Hospital Psychiatry
2006; 28(2):145-53.
|