Talk to the Veterans Crisis Line now
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government

VA Health Systems Research

Go to the VA ORD website
Go to the QUERI website

IIR 17-231 – HSR Study

 
IIR 17-231
Are Veterans' Outcomes Better when VHA Purchases High-Quality Nursing Home Care?
Cari R. Levy, MD PhD
Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO
Aurora, CO
Funding Period: January 2019 - June 2022

Abstract

Background: Over the last decade, the Veterans' Health Administration (VHA) has shifted from providing long-term and post-acute care in facilities owned and operated by states or the VHA, toward contracted care in privately-owned facilities, known as community nursing homes (CNHs). From fiscal years 2000 to 2015, expenditures for CNH care in the VHA expanded from $227 million to $861 million—nearly a fourfold increase. Meanwhile, the Office of Inspector General and General Accountability Office have raised concerns that the VHA contracts with low-quality providers. Through a Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI)-funded CNH Dashboard, Veteran Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs) now have ready access to real-time information that displays data on the quality ratings of facilities caring for their Veterans relative to other, non-contracted facilities in the same local market and nationally. However, those data have not been analyzed to reveal trends or patterns across VAMCs that could inform VHA's purchasing policy and operations. Furthermore, the publicly-reported quality star ratings from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) have not been validated for their relevance to important Veterans' outcomes. The objective of the proposed research is to characterize variation in CNH quality as it relates to VAMC characteristics, Veteran outcomes, and contracting practices. Our central hypothesis is that a significant portion of VAMCs have opportunities to improve practices related to the purchase of high-quality care for Veterans that will lead to improved outcomes by optimizing identifiable contracting policies and practices. The significance that motivates the proposed project is that identifying variation in quality, quantifying potential gains, and understanding the policies associated with success within an integrated health care system will also contribute to our general understanding of the use of quality information in purchasing policies and practices, an HSR&D priority area of long-term care which is of broad concern to health services research in this era of value based purchasing. The Specific Aims of this proposal are to: Aim 1. Characterize utilization, cost, and quality of care that Veterans receive from VHA-contracted compared to non-contracted community nursing homes (CNHs) available in the same market area. Aim 2. Determine whether utilization of highly-rated CNHs improves outcomes for Veterans. Aim 3. Identify incentive characteristics and contextual factors that contribute to purchase of high-quality CNH care by VAMCs. Methods: Aim 1 will use descriptive analysis to compare Veterans' utilization of nursing home care, including length of stay, concentration of Veteran population within individual nursing homes, and allocation of care to CNH compared to other VHA long-term care and post-acute settings in each study year 2013-2017. Risk- adjusted total direct CNH payments per Veteran will be calculated and the relationship between price and quality rating will be modeled. For Aim 2 we will estimate the effect of increases in quality ratings on Veterans' outcomes. We will test the hypothesis that increasing the availability of highly-rated facilities among Veterans' CNH options results in fewer hospitalizations and an increased likelihood of successful discharge to the community. Using highly-innovative analytic technique, potential cost offsets available from reduced hospitalization in highly-rated nursing homes will be quantified. Aim 3 will use the analyses in Aim 1 to identify a sample of VAMCs with variation in relative quality. Two in-person site visits and subsequent semi-structured telephone interviews with key VHA and community stakeholders will be conducted and analyzed using a general inductive qualitative approach to identify how incentive characteristics and contextual factors support or thwart purchase of care from high quality CNHs. Results will be used to create a web-based toolkit to inform program revisions and VHA purchased care policy in general to purchase of high-quality CNH Veteran care.

External Links for this Project

NIH Reporter

Grant Number: I01HX002529-01A1
Link: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/9612469



Dimensions for VA

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

Learn more about Dimensions for VA.

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.
    Search Dimensions for this project

PUBLICATIONS:


Journal Articles

  1. Moyo P, Corneau E, Cornell PY, Mochel AL, Magid KH, Levy C, Mor V. Antipsychotic initiation and new diagnoses excluded from quality-measure reporting among Veterans in community nursing homes contracted by the Veterans Health Administration in the United States. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research. 2022 Mar 1; 31(1):e1898. [view]
  2. Cornell PY, Magid KH, Corneau E, Haverhals LM, Levy C. Decline in Veterans' Admissions to Nursing Homes during COVID-19: Fewer Beds, More Fear, and Finding Alternative Care Settings. Journal of The American Medical Directors Association. 2023 Apr 1; 24(4):447-450. [view]
  3. Magid KH, Galenbeck E, Haverhals LM, Cornell PY, Moyo P, Mochel AL, Corneau E, Rudolph JL, Mor V, Levy C. Purchasing High-Quality Community Nursing Home Care: A Will to Work With VHA Diminished by Contracting Burdens. Journal of The American Medical Directors Association. 2022 Nov 1; 23(11):1757-1764. [view]


DRA: Health Systems, Aging, Older Veterans' Health and Care, Other Conditions
DRE: Treatment - Observational, Treatment - Comparative Effectiveness, TRL - Development
Keywords: Outcomes - Patient, Quality of Life, Rehabilitation
MeSH Terms: None at this time.

Questions about the HSR website? Email the Web Team

Any health information on this website is strictly for informational purposes and is not intended as medical advice. It should not be used to diagnose or treat any condition.