IIR 11-110
Preparing Older Veterans with Serious and Chronic Illness for Decision Making
Rebecca Sudore, MD San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA San Francisco, CA Funding Period: July 2012 - June 2016 |
BACKGROUND/RATIONALE:
4.5 million Veterans are over age 65 and an increasing number are living with chronic and serious illness. Most older Veterans and their surrogate decision makers will eventually face complex, ongoing decisions over the course of chronic illness. These decisions are difficult, especially for the estimated 50% of older Veterans with limited health literacy. The old paradigm of advance care planning has focused on making decisions about life- prolonging procedures (e.g., resuscitation) by completing advance directives. Yet, the forms are difficult to understand and often fail to prepare patients with concrete skills, such as how to identify one's values and communicate with surrogates and clinicians. We published a new paradigm of advance care planning focused on preparing patients to communicate with their surrogates and to participate with clinicians in making the best possible in-the-moment decisions. To do this effectively, Veterans need to prepare. However, an easy-to-use, culturally-appropriate preparation guide does not exist. We have created an easy-to-understand (5th grade reading level) preparation guide based on our new paradigm called PREPARE. PREPARE is designed to teach Veterans preparation skills including how to choose a surrogate and discuss surrogate decision making, clarify personal values for specific health states, and ask clinicians questions to make informed choices. OBJECTIVE(S): The aims of this study are: (1) to conduct a randomized control trial to determine the efficacy of PREPARE to engage older Veterans with chronic illness in preparation skill behaviors (i.e., did they choose a surrogate, clarify their values, ask clinicians questions); (2) to determine the efficacy of PREPARE to activate Veterans and clinicians within clinical encounters (i.e., did Veterans ask clinicians questions or discuss preparation topics and did clinicians respond) and to improve satisfaction with decision making; and (3) to obtain input from Veterans, surrogates, and clinicians about implementation of PREPARE within the VA. METHODS: To achieve Aim 1, 205 Veterans will be randomly assigned to the intervention (PREPARE materials plus an advance directive) and 205 will be assigned to the control group (advance directive only). Veterans in the PREPARE arm will view the easy-to-understand, multi-media PREPARE website during the study interview and then take home PREPARE materials in photo booklet, DVD, and pamphlet format to ensure universal access to the information. The primary outcome is Veteran-reported engagement in preparation skill behaviors at 3 and 6 months, which will be measured with standard cognitive behavioral measures. For Aim 2, activation within the clinical encounters will be measured with validated quantitative analysis techniques of audio-recordings. Satisfaction with decision making will be measured with validated, self-reported measures. For Aim 3, we will ask Veterans randomized to the PREPARE arm and their surrogates and clinicians how best to implement PREPARE within the clinical setting. We will use standard parametric or non-parametric statistical tests to assess group differences, will control for demographic or other variables that differ between randomization groups, and adjust for potential clustering by clinician. For Aims 1 and 2 we will assess differences in engagement and satisfaction by race/ethnicity, literacy, and gender. FINDINGS/RESULTS: We enrolled 414 Veterans, 205 in the PREPARE intervention group and 209 in the control group. There were no differences in gender or race/ethnicity of veterans who refused; however, those who refused were older than those who enrolled. The mean age of enrolled participants was 71.1 (7.8) years, 38 (9%) were women, 179 (43%) were nonwhite, 120 (29%) reported fair-to-poor health status, and 212 (51%) had evidence of prior ACP documentation. The mean ACP documentation rate 6 months prior to intervention exposure was 0.8%(0.6%) for both groups. There were no differences in participant characteristics between arms, and then number of enrolled veterans per clinician was 5(6) [range, 1-28]. At 6 months, 184 participants in the PREPARE plus AD arm and 188 in the AD-only arm completed follow-up interviews (a 90% retention rate). There were no significant differences between groups in the rates of, or reasons for, withdrawal (9 patients [7%] in each arm). At 9 months, in mixed-effects adjusted analysis, new over-all ACP documentation was higher in the PREPARE plus AD vs the AD-only arm (unadjusted analyses, 37% vs 27%, P =.04; and adjusted analyses, 35% vs 25%, adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.61; 95% CI, 1.03-2.51, P = .04), including higher documentation for legal forms and orders (20% vs 13%; P = .04) and for documented discussions (26% vs 20%; P = .13). Self-reported ACP engagement including mean process and action scores increased significantly more in the PREPARE plus AD arm compared with the AD-only arm, group x time P < .001. Effect size estimates were moderate for PREPARE plus AD (0.59 to 0.68 SDs for process scores, 0.49 to 0.59 SDs for action scores) and were small for the AD-only arm (0.24 to 0.39 for process scores, 0.20 to 0.39 SDs for action scores). There were no significant interaction effects observed for ACP documentation or ACP engagement as a function of age, gender, race/ethnicity, US acculturation, health literacy, presence of a surrogate decision maker, health status, access to or confidence using the internet, or prior ACP documentation. There were no significant differences in the 10-point self-reported ease-of-use scales for PREPARE plus AD vs the AD-only intervention (9.0[1.4] vs 8.7 [1.7]; P = .31) or for the 5-point satisfaction scales including comfort reviewing the interventions (4.5 [0.7]) vs 4.4[0.8]; P = .57); helpfulness (4.4[0.8] vs 4.3 [0.9]; P = .19); and likelihood of recommending the guides (4.4 [0.9] vs 4.2 [1.1]; P = .10). After controlling for baseline scores, there were no differences in depression or anxiety between arms at 6 months. IMPACT: In the absence of clinician- or systems-level interventions, the easy-to-read advance directive (AD) increased new documentation of ACP legal forms and discussions in the medical chart to 25%. The addition of the novel PREPARE website increased new documentation of ACP legal forms and discussions in the medical chart to 35%; a statistically significant increase from the AD alone. Self-reported ACP engagement, including validated mean ACP process and action scores, increased significantly more in the PREPARE plus AD arm compared to the AD-only arm. Both tools were rated highly in terms of ease-of-use, satisfaction, and helpfulness, suggesting that PREPARE and the easy-to-read AD could serve as scalable, easy-to-disseminate tools to improve the ACP process, especially in busy and resource-poor primary care clinics. Prior studies have shown that passive ACP education with written materials is less effective than ongoing education by a trained health care professional. One reason may be the use of ADs and other materials written beyond a 12th grade reading level. The success of both PREPARE and the easy-to-read AD may be explained by their attention to both literacy and cultural considerations designed with and for diverse communities. The PREPARE website may also help patients engage in ACP by providing "how-to" videos that model behavior based on behavior change and social cognitive theories. External Links for this ProjectNIH ReporterGrant Number: I01HX000694-01A1Link: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/8270871 Dimensions for VADimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.Learn more about Dimensions for VA. VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address. Search Dimensions for this project PUBLICATIONS:Journal Articles
DRA:
Aging, Older Veterans' Health and Care, Health Systems Science
DRE: Prevention Keywords: none MeSH Terms: none |