Talk to the Veterans Crisis Line now
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government

VA Health Systems Research

Go to the VA ORD website
Go to the QUERI website

IIR 07-145 – HSR Study

IIR 07-145
Trial of Low And High Intensity Strategies to Maintain Blood Pressure Control
Gary E. Rosenthal, MD
Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, IA
Iowa City, IA
Funding Period: October 2008 - December 2013
In recent years, multidisciplinary strategies, based on the Chronic Care Model, have been used to overcome barriers to the treatment of hypertension (HTN) and other chronic illnesses. One such model recommended by VA / DoD HTN guidelines note is management by a pharmacist to achieve BP control goals. However, while pharmacist models of BP control have been shown to be efficacious, studies are limited by small samples and short follow-up (typically 6-12 months). Most importantly, once BP is controlled with such models, current guidelines do not provide recommendations on sustaining long-term BP control.

A major gap in our understanding is how to best sustain the effects of interventions to improve BP control and whether continued intensive interventions are needed or whether patients can be returned to primary care after an initial intervention. The three aims of this study were to:

1) Compare changes in BP in patients randomized to a long-term pharmacist intervention after an initial 6-month intervention or to a one-time education intervention after the initial 6-month intervention;

2) Compare antihypertensive medication intensification in the two groups; and

3) Compare medication adherence in the two groups.

This four-year randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Iowa City VA Health Care System and two community-based clinics. Patients were eligible if they were enrolled in primary care, had a diagnosis of HTN, and had elevated BP ( 140/90 mm Hg among nondiabetics or 140/80 mm Hg among diabetics) during their most recent VA clinic visit or based on the average from the last 3 visits. Eligible patients were enrolled and informed consent obtained if they did not have any exclusion criteria (e.g., dementia, left ventricular ejection fraction less than 35%, renal insufficiency, cirrhosis). Enrolled patients were subsequently excluded if their BP was not elevated BP during a baseline measurement by the research team. All patients received a 6-month high intensity pharmacist intervention. Following this period, the study randomized patients to a continued high intensity pharmacist intervention or to a one-time low intensity education intervention. Randomization was stratified according to whether BP was controlled after the 6-month intervention. Patients were followed for an additional 24 months. The high intensity intervention had several components, including: 1) comprehensive medication assessment by the pharmacist; 2) an explicit plan to intensify medications if indicated; 3) strategies to improve medication adherence; and 4) follow-up pharmacist visits to sustain BP control. BP was assessed at baseline, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30 months using a rigorous, standard measurement protocol. The primary outcome measure was the difference in mean BP between the high and low intensity intervention groups. Secondary endpoints included rates of BP control, medication intensification, and medication adherence, as measured by two self-report scales. In addition, a formative evaluation based on semi-structured patient interviews assessed the impact of the pharmacist intervention during the initial 6-month and subsequent follow-up periods.

Study enrollment began in November 2009. Informed consent was obtained from 249 patients who met the study eligibility criteria, including a prior diagnosis of hypertension and uncontrolled BP at the two most recent clinics visits. Of these patients, 122 (49%) had controlled BP (mean BP 126/71), as determined by the study BP measurement protocol, and were not enrolled in the initial 6-month pharmacist intervention. The remaining 127 patients who began the intervention had a mean age of 64.5 10.9 years; 98% were male, 95% were white, and 61% were married.

BP was reduced (P<.01) in diabetic patients by the 6-month intervention. Mean declines were 8.0 14.4 mm Hg for systolic BP and 4.0 9.1 mm Hg for diastolic BP. BP was reduced (P<.001) even more in nondiabetic patients (14.0 11.9 mm Hg and 5.0 10.0 mm Hg for systolic and diastolic BP, respectively). BP was controlled in 69 (54%) patients Of the There were significant differences in medication changes between the controlled and uncontrolled patients, such that the number of medications was increased more frequently in controlled group (P=.04). Thiazide diuretics were used more frequently by patients with controlled than uncontrolled BP (65% vs. 47%; P=.04). Adherence improved from baseline to 6 months, as measured by the Morisky score (P=.002), but did not improve (P=.12) as measured by the Hill-Bone score.

Following the 6-month intervention, 109 patients were randomized to the continued high intensity intervention (n=54) or the low intensity intervention (n=55). Subsequent follow-up data was available for 109 patients at 12 months, 106 at 18 months, 105 at 24 months, and 104 at 30 months.

BP control was similar (P>.1) in high and low intensity intervention patients at all follow-up points: 44% vs. 49% at 12 months, 48% vs. 52% at 18 months, 50% vs. 53% at 24 months, and 61% vs. 53% at 30 months. Mean systolic and diastolic BPs were also similar (P>.1) at each follow-up point. For example mean systolic BPs in the high and low intensity groups were 135 vs. 137 mm Hg and 132 vs. 136 mm Hg at 18 and 30 months, respectively, while mean diastolic BPs were 73 vs. 75 mm Hg and 72 vs. 74 mm Hg, respectively. Medication adherence, as measured by both the Morisky and Hill-Bone scales were also similar in the high and low intensity intervention groups at all follow-up points.

This study provides important insights on the long-term control of BP in patients with HTN. Specifically, the study found that BP control was maintained over a 24 month period by a one-time education intervention following a 6-month high-intensity intervention. Thus, the study findings indicate that patients with uncontrolled HTN who receive a short-term 6-month pharmacist intervention can be provided with a less intense intervention and returned to primary care after the initial intervention.

External Links for this Project

Dimensions for VA

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

Learn more about Dimensions for VA.

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.
    Search Dimensions for this project


Journal Articles

  1. Parker CP, Cunningham CL, Carter BL, Vander Weg MW, Richardson KK, Rosenthal GE. A mixed-method approach to evaluate a pharmacist intervention for veterans with hypertension. Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.). 2014 Feb 1; 16(2):133-40. [view]
  2. Carter BL, Chrischilles EA, Rosenthal G, Gryzlak BM, Eisenstein EL, Vander Weg MW. Efficacy and safety of nighttime dosing of antihypertensives: review of the literature and design of a pragmatic clinical trial. Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.). 2014 Feb 1; 16(2):115-21. [view]
  3. Hawkins MS, Hough LJ, Berger MA, Mor MK, Steenkiste AR, Gao S, Stone RA, Burkitt KH, Marcus BH, Ciccolo JT, Kriska AM, Klinvex DT, Sevick MA. Recruitment of veterans from primary care into a physical activity randomized controlled trial: the experience of the VA-STRIDE study. Trials. 2014 Jan 7; 15(1):11. [view]
  4. Carter BL, Coffey CS, Uribe L, James PA, Egan BM, Ardery G, Chrischilles EA, Ecklund D, Vander Weg M, Vaughn T, Collaboration Among Pharmacists and Physicians to Improve Outcomes Now (CAPTION) trial investigators. Similar blood pressure values across racial and economic groups: baseline data from a group randomized clinical trial. Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.). 2013 Jun 1; 15(6):404-12. [view]
  5. Carter BL, Vander Weg MW, Parker CP, Goedken CC, Richardson KK, Rosenthal GE. Sustained Blood Pressure Control Following Discontinuation of a Pharmacist Intervention for Veterans. Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.). 2015 Sep 1; 17(9):701-8. [view]
Conference Presentations

  1. Egts S, Baldwin A, Ishani A, Wilson HS, Vander Weg MW, Christensen AJ, Kaboli PJ. Does Patient Role-orientation Predict Patient-initiated Discussions with Providers? Insights from the VA Project to Implement Diuretics (VAPID). Paper presented at: Society of General Internal Medicine Annual Meeting; 2008 Apr 11; Pittsburgh, PA. [view]
  2. Carter BL, Coffey CS, Ardery G, Ecklund D, James PA, Eagan BM, Vander Weg MW, Chrischilles EA, Vaughn TE. Implementation of a Physician/Pharmacist Model to Improve Blood Pressure Control in a Diverse Population. Poster session presented at: American Society of Hypertension Annual Scientific Meeting; 2014 May 16; New York, NY. [view]
  3. Carter BL, Demik D, Vander Weg MW, Lundt E, Coffey C, Ardery G. Prediction of the Implementation of the Physician-Pharmacist Collaborative Model Using the Theory of Planned Behavior. Paper presented at: North American Primary Care Research Group Annual Meeting; 2011 Nov 14; Banff, Alberta, Canada. [view]

DRA: Health Systems, Cardiovascular Disease
DRE: Treatment - Observational, Prevention, Treatment - Comparative Effectiveness
Keywords: Adherence, Cost effectiveness, Hypertension
MeSH Terms: none

Questions about the HSR website? Email the Web Team

Any health information on this website is strictly for informational purposes and is not intended as medical advice. It should not be used to diagnose or treat any condition.