Comparing four competing models of depressive symptomatology: a confirmatory factor analytic study of 986,647 U.S. veterans.

Tsai J, Elhai JD, Pietrzak RH, Hoff RA, Harpaz-Rotem I. Comparing four competing models of depressive symptomatology: a confirmatory factor analytic study of 986,647 U.S. veterans. Journal of affective disorders. 2014 Aug 1; 165:166-9.

Related HSR&D Project(s)

• CDA 10-212 – Evaluation of VA's Supported Housing Program for Homeless Veterans

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.    Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions

Search for Abstract from PubMed

---

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Few rigorous studies have examined the factor structure of major depression symptoms as assessed by current diagnostic systems. This study evaluated four competing models of depressive symptomatology among a large, heterogeneous sample of U.S. veterans. METHODS: To determine the best fitting model of major depressive symptoms among four competing models, this study conducted a series of confirmatory factor analyses on a national sample of 986,647 U.S. veterans. RESULTS: A two-factor model first reported by Krause, Reed, and McArdle (2010) provided superior fit to symptom-level data compared to three other models. The optimal model consists of a somatic factor including anhedonia, sleep difficulties, fatigue, appetite changes, concentration difficulties, and psychomotor agitation; and a non-somatic factor including depressed mood, feelings of worthlessness, and thoughts of death. Factorial invariance testing found this model to be invariant by gender and major depression diagnosis. LIMITATIONS: A widely used self-report measure of depression was used and the sample consisted solely of veterans so further study is needed with clinician-administered measures and non-veteran samples. CONCLUSIONS: Together, these findings support separating symptoms of major depression into somatic and non-somatic factors which may have clinical relevance, and help clarify debates about the factor structure of depressive symptoms.