Medication reconciliation: barriers and facilitators from the perspectives of resident physicians and pharmacists.

Boockvar KS, Santos SL, Kushniruk A, Johnson C, Nebeker JR. Medication reconciliation: barriers and facilitators from the perspectives of resident physicians and pharmacists. Journal of hospital medicine. 2011 Jul 1; 6(6):329-37.

Related HSR&D Project(s)

• IAB 05-204 – Reducing Transition Drug Risks after Patient Transfer

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.    Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions

Search for Abstract from PubMed

---

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Medication reconciliation can prevent medication errors and harm when patients transition between hospital and other care settings. Though a Joint Commission hospital Patient Safety Goal since 2006, organizations continue to have difficulty implementing the process. OBJECTIVE: To determine factors that influence performance of medication reconciliation in a hospital setting with a computerized medication reconciliation tool. DESIGN: Cognitive task analysis (CTA) and focus group interviews. SETTING: Urban, academic, tertiary-care Veterans Affairs medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Internal medicine house staff physicians (n = 23) and inpatient staff pharmacists (n = 12). MEASUREMENTS: CTA participants verbalized their thoughts while they completed medication reconciliation with the computerized tool. Focus group participants described medication reconciliation''s purpose and effectiveness, how they completed the task, and its barriers and facilitators. Interviews were recorded and analyzed using social science methods for analyzing qualitative data. RESULTS: Participants agreed that a central goal of medication reconciliation is to prevent prescribing errors, but disagreed about whether it achieves this goal. Computerization facilitated the task, but participants said that computers and patients can be unreliable sources of information. Participants varied in how they sequenced components of the task. When time was limited, physicians considered other responsibilities higher priority. Both physicians and pharmacists expressed low self-efficacy, ie, low perceived capability to achieve the objectives of the process. CONCLUSION: Key barriers to medication reconciliation are unreliable sources of medication information and tasks that compete for providers'' time and attention that they consider higher priority. Addressing these barriers while increasing providers'' self-efficacy might improve medication reconciliation and its outcomes.