Talk to the Veterans Crisis Line now
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government

Health Services Research & Development

Go to the ORD website
Go to the QUERI website

HSR&D Citation Abstract

Search | Search by Center | Search by Source | Keywords in Title

Cardiovascular outcome ascertainment was similar using blinded and unblinded adjudicators in a national prospective study.

Parmar G, Ghuge P, Halanych JH, Funkhouser E, Safford MM. Cardiovascular outcome ascertainment was similar using blinded and unblinded adjudicators in a national prospective study. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2010 Oct 1; 63(10):1159-63.

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.
   Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions



Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: Observational studies can avoid biases by blinding medical records to characteristics of interest before outcome adjudication. However, blinding is costly. We assessed the effect of blinding race and geography on outcome ascertainment. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: The Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke - Myocardial Infarction (REGARDS-MI) Study is an ancillary study to the REGARDS national prospective cohort study including 30,228 participants. The primary characteristics of interest are race and geography, and the prespecified acceptable agreement rate between adjudicators is set at less than 80%. We selected 116 suspected cardiovascular events that underwent adjudication with usual blinding. At least 3 months later, cases were readjudicated without blinding race and geographic location of the patient. We assessed differences in outcome ascertainment using Cohen's kappa statistic and ARs. RESULTS: Agreement between blinded and unblinded reviews was good to excellent for all four outcomes. kappa statistics were 0.80 (chest pain), 0.85 (heart failure), 0.86 (revascularization), and 0.74 (MI) (P < 0.0001 for all). Within each outcome, ARs were similar for race and geographic groups (agreement: 83-100%). CONCLUSION: In observational studies, blinding medical record review for outcome ascertainment for some types of patient characteristics may cause an unwarranted expense.





Questions about the HSR&D website? Email the Web Team.

Any health information on this website is strictly for informational purposes and is not intended as medical advice. It should not be used to diagnose or treat any condition.