Talk to the Veterans Crisis Line now
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government

VA Health Systems Research

Go to the VA ORD website
Go to the QUERI website

HSR&D Citation Abstract

Search | Search by Center | Search by Source | Keywords in Title

Nodal evaluation in Wilms' tumors: analysis of the national cancer data base.

Raval MV, Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, Ko CY, Reynolds M. Nodal evaluation in Wilms' tumors: analysis of the national cancer data base. Annals of surgery. 2010 Mar 1; 251(3):559-65.

Related HSR&D Project(s)

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.
   Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions


OBJECTIVE: We used a large US clinical cancer registry to assess nodal evaluation performance in children with Wilms' Tumors (WT), to determined factors associated with nodal evaluation, and to define the prognostic importance of nodal status. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Lymph node assessment remains a part of accurate staging and helps determine therapy for patients with WT. Lack of nodal assessment has been noted but not well studied. METHODS: Patients (0-18 years) with WT from the National Cancer Data Base (1985-2001) were assessed for nodal evaluation. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with the likelihood of lymph node evaluation. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression was used to estimate the risk of mortality. RESULTS: Of 3593 patients, 1510 (42%) had no lymph nodes evaluated by pathology and reported to the National Cancer Data Base. Of 2083 patients who had lymph nodes assessed, 535 (25.7%) had positive nodes. Patients age 2 years or younger, with larger tumor size, and treated at a higher volume center were more likely to have nodes assessed (P < 0.01). Patients who had nodes evaluated had a better 5-year survival compared with those who did not have nodes evaluated (92.2% vs. 88.1%, P < 0.001). In Cox regression, nodal metastases (P < 0.001; HR: 2.2, CI: 1.6-3.0) were associated with increased risk of death after adjusting for patient, tumor, and hospital characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients do not have lymph nodes evaluated during WT resection. Opportunities exist for improved staging and possibly survival in patients with WT through better nodal assessment.

Questions about the HSR website? Email the Web Team

Any health information on this website is strictly for informational purposes and is not intended as medical advice. It should not be used to diagnose or treat any condition.