Talk to the Veterans Crisis Line now
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government

Health Services Research & Development

Go to the ORD website
Go to the QUERI website

HSR&D Citation Abstract

Search | Search by Center | Search by Source | Keywords in Title

Perceived Risk for Influenza in Veterans with Spinal Cord Injuries and Disorders

LaVela SL, Smith BM, Weaver FM. Perceived Risk for Influenza in Veterans with Spinal Cord Injuries and Disorders. Rehabilitation Psychology. 2007 Nov 1; 52(4):458-462.

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.
   Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions



Abstract:

Objective: Guided by the Extended Parallel Process Model, the objective was to assess the type of control processes that were dominant in influenza behavior decisions, and to compare characteristics and behaviors by dominating control type. Design: Cross-sectional survey of persons with spinal cord injuries and disorders (SCIandD). Results: Response rate was 31% (n = 968). Respondents on average were 60 years old, 98%men, 79% white, and 61% paraplegic. Most (~60%) were in danger control in regard to influenza risk. Persons in fear control were more likely to report having had an influenza infection in the prior year (p = 0.000). Among the non-vaccinated, those in fear control were more likely to indicate not knowing where to get the vaccine (p = 0.016) and that it was not available (p = 0.027). Alternatively, the non-vaccinated who were in danger control believed they did not need it (p = 0.023). Respondents with critical values of zero were more likely to indicate that a health care professional did not recommend the shot to them (p = 0.002). Conclusions: Most persons with SCIandD perceived efficacy to be stronger than threat related to influenza; the EPPM suggests that they are aware of their risk, but recognize their ability to do something to effectively avert it. For the majority in danger control, theory suggests that messages about influenza should focus on increasing perceptions of severity and susceptibility to positively affect behavior change. Unexpected findings indicated no significant differences in vaccine receipt by control category which may be due to high overall vaccination rates. However, individuals in fear control were more likely to have had influenza in the prior year suggesting that they may have controlled the fear by ignoring the message and not getting vaccinated. For those in fear control, messages should focus on efficacy only. Among individuals with a critical value of zero, theory suggests that no threat was induced and/or there was no motivation and therefore a high threat/high efficacy approach should be taken.





Questions about the HSR&D website? Email the Web Team.

Any health information on this website is strictly for informational purposes and is not intended as medical advice. It should not be used to diagnose or treat any condition.