Talk to the Veterans Crisis Line now
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government

VA Health Systems Research

Go to the VA ORD website
Go to the QUERI website

HSR Citation Abstract

Search | Search by Center | Search by Source | Keywords in Title

Learning & motivational talk in smoking cessation interventions: An examination of session language in two randomized trials.

Borsari B, Herbst E, Ladd BO, Delacruz J, Mastroleo N, Smith AR, Fetterling T, Poole L, Baxley C, Wu A. Learning & motivational talk in smoking cessation interventions: An examination of session language in two randomized trials. Patient education and counseling. 2025 Jan 1; 130:108421, DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108421.

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.
   Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions



Abstract:

OBJECTIVES: Motivational Interviewing (MI), a client-centered approach that seeks to evoke and resolve ambivalence, and health education (HE), which provides health information and advice, may both provide some benefit to unmotivated smokers. In HE, it is possible that client language reflective of new learning, or "learning talk" (LT), and rejection of health advice, or "rejection talk," (RT), may uniquely reflect intent of subsequent behavior change. METHODS: This project utilized MI and HE sessions from two randomized clinical trials (RCTs), one in a low-income, diverse community civilian sample of 255 unmotivated smokers, and the other in a sample of Veterans with mental illness who were unmotivated smokers (n  =  55). Mixed methods approaches were utilized to reliably code sessions using the Motivational Interviewing Skill Code 2.5 (MISC 2.5) and a refined Learning Talk coding system. RESULTS: Reliability of LT and RT codes ranged from fair to excellent (ICCs from 0.43-0.93). CONCLUSION: LT appears to be a unique construct and its impact on post-session changes in smoking is warranted. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This system can be used in a study to code existing interventions for smokers using both MI and HE techniques and relate in-session client LT to subsequent smoking behaviors.





Questions about the HSR website? Email the Web Team

Any health information on this website is strictly for informational purposes and is not intended as medical advice. It should not be used to diagnose or treat any condition.