Talk to the Veterans Crisis Line now
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government

VA Health Systems Research

Go to the VA ORD website
Go to the QUERI website

HSR Citation Abstract

Search | Search by Center | Search by Source | Keywords in Title

United States Veterans' Utilization of Spinal Cord Injuries and Disorders Annual Evaluation Services.

Sippel J, Etingen B, Stroupe K, Evans C, Huo Z, Frazier B, Wickremasinghe M, Smith B. United States Veterans' Utilization of Spinal Cord Injuries and Disorders Annual Evaluation Services. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2024 Sep 27.

Related HSR&D Project(s)

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.
   Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions



Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate Veterans' engagement in spinal cord injury and disorder (SCI/D) specialty annual evaluations (AEs). DESIGN: Cross-sectional retrospective cohort study. SETTING: SCI/D System of Care, United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). PARTICIPANTS: Veterans with SCI/Ds (N = 14,662). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Receiving SCI/D AEs during the study period (fiscal years [FY] 2019 and 2020). RESULTS: A total of 14,662 Veterans with SCI/Ds were included in the sample; 32.8% (n = 4811) received 2 AEs, 28.8% (n = 4219) received 1 AE, and 38.4% (n = 5632) received no AEs, with an average of 0.9 AEs per Veteran over the 2-year study timeframe (range, 0-2y). Black Veterans had an 8% higher number of AEs than White Veterans after adjusting for other variables (adjusted relative risk [RR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.12). Veterans who lived 240 minutes away from a VA SCI/D System of Care Center had 45% fewer AEs than Veterans who lived within 30 minutes (adjusted RR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.52-0.59). Veterans with more SCI/D specialty visits had 90% more AEs than those with fewer visits (adjusted RR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.78-2.03), whereas Veterans with more outpatient visits in VA primary care had 28% fewer AEs (adjusted RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.69-0.76). Veterans with higher comorbidity scores had 9% more AEs than Veterans with lower scores (adjusted RR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.61-0.70). CONCLUSIONS: More than half (62%) of Veterans received 1 SCI/D AE during FY19-20. Veterans living closer to a VA SCI/D System of Care Center/Hub had more engagement in SCI/D AEs. Veterans with SCI/Ds who used VA primary care outside of the SCI/D System of Care had fewer AEs. There were no major racial, age-based, or sex disparities in SCI/D AE usage. Our findings suggest the need for targeted intervention efforts to promote AE use among Veterans.





Questions about the HSR website? Email the Web Team

Any health information on this website is strictly for informational purposes and is not intended as medical advice. It should not be used to diagnose or treat any condition.