Search | Search by Center | Search by Source | Keywords in Title
Alpert, Obedin-Maliver, Gjelsvik, Amanullah, Shireman, Blosnich. Does cancer clinical trial enrollment for sexual and gender minority people differ from heterosexual, cisgender people? Contemporary clinical trials. 2024 Nov 1; 146:107695, DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107695.
BACKGROUND: Sexual and gender minority (SGM) people experience cancer disparities compared to heterosexual and cisgender (non-SGM) people and likely have barriers to cancer clinical trial enrollment. Data are sparse, however, regarding cancer clinical trial enrollment for SGM versus non-SGM people. METHODS: Using data from the 2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (BRFSS), we applied a logistic regression to assess associations between SGM status and clinical trial enrollment for 346 SGM and 9441 non-SGM people diagnosed with cancer. The model was adjusted for age at diagnosis, race/ethnicity, partnership status, education, employment, and sex assigned at birth. RESULTS: SGM individuals had 94 % greater odds than non-SGM individuals to report participation in a clinical trial (aOR 1.94; 95 % CI 1.02-3.68) after adjusting for other factors. CONCLUSIONS: Data from the BRFSS suggest that SGM people with cancer have higher odds of clinical trial enrollment compared to non-SGM people with cancer. Future work is needed to prospectively track oncology treatment, including clinical trial participation, and outcomes of SGM people versus non-SGM people with cancer. Other studies will be needed to develop and implement systematic, consistent, and non-stigmatizing sexual orientation and gender identity data collection methods.