Search | Search by Center | Search by Source | Keywords in Title
Blok AC, Drake C, Decosimo K, Zullig LL, Hughes JM, Sperber NR, Kota S, Franzosa E, Coffman CJ, Shepherd-Banigan M, Chadduck T, Allen KD, Hastings SN, Van Houtven CH. Adaptations and early adoption of a family caregiver intervention in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System: A multimethod pragmatic approach for national scaling. Health services research. 2024 Dec 1; 59 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):e14360.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between site-level adaptation and early adoption of Caregivers Finding Important Resources, Support, and Training (FIRST) training during national implementation across diverse Veteran Health Administration (VA) medical centers. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING: We enrolled and evaluated 25 VA medical centers (VAMCs). Along with administrative data on site characteristics, we examined site-reported data on adaptations and intervention adoption, defined as = 4 training classes delivered to = 5 caregivers at 6?months from April through October 2022. STUDY DESIGN: A type III hybrid implementation-effectiveness cluster randomized controlled trial, randomized VAMCs 1:1 to receive foundational (low-touch) implementation support (n? = 12) or the addition of enhanced (high-touch) implementation support (n? = 13). DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: At key implementation phases, VAMCs were asked to report adaptations including content, contextual modifications (format, setting, personnel, and population), and training of providers. We describe site-level adaptations by arm and by organizational characteristics that included VAMC complexity level, staffing, rurality, and organizational readiness to change. We used qualitative comparative analysis to identify unique adaptations that contributed to intervention adoption at 6 months. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: VAMCs randomized to receive enhanced support reported slightly more adaptations than those randomized to foundational support. At 6?months, VAMCs with two or more adaptations adopted Caregivers FIRST at a higher rate than those with fewer adaptations (90% vs. 44%). Staffing adaptations (e.g., who delivered the intervention), format and content (e.g., modified delivery pace), and referring provider training were unique adaptations to adopting sites. CONCLUSIONS: Site-level adaptations were diverse and occurred more frequently in sites with early adoption of Caregivers FIRST. Future research should identify best practices of supporting and monitoring intervention adaptation. Understanding the role of adaptation in early adoption success could assist other healthcare systems in implementing interventions for caregivers.