Providers' experiences discussing care for patients with kidney failure who forgo kidney replacement therapy: A national qualitative study.

Wong SPY, Chotivatanapong J, Lee D, Lam DY, van Eijk MS. Providers' experiences discussing care for patients with kidney failure who forgo kidney replacement therapy: A national qualitative study. Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN. 2024 Jul 18.

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.    Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions

Search for Abstract from PubMed

---

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Many nephrology providers express difficulty in discussing care options for patients who forgo kidney replacement therapy (KRT), which hampers their ability to help patients make decisions about their current and future treatment of kidney disease. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study using interviews with a national sample of nephrology providers (i.e., physicians and advanced practice providers) who participated in US professional societies between July and December 2022. We performed a thematic analysis of interviews to identify emergent themes reflecting providers'' experiences discussing care for patients who forgo KRT. RESULTS: There were 21 providers (age 54±13years, female 81%, White 32%) who participated in interviews, of which 43% were physicians and most (57%) practiced in academic settings. Three dominant themes emerged from interviews: 1) Inconsistent terminology: while providers sought to use terms to describe care for patients who forgo KRT that affirmed patients'' decision, clearly conveyed that KRT would not be pursued, and were familiar to patients and other providers, they disagreed about which terms satisfied these priorities; 2) Blurred distinctions between KRT and its alternative: providers'' descriptions of their care practices suggested that differences in their approaches to caring for patients who forgo KRT and those who are planning to pursue KRT could be opaque; and, 3) Deciphering patients'' decision to forgo KRT: providers did not readily accept patients'' expressed preferences to forgo KRT at face value and described using a variety of methods to assess whether patients would follow through with their decision. CONCLUSIONS: Providers used different, inconsistent terms to describe care for patients who forgo KRT. They disagreed about what this care entailed and were uncertain about what patients might mean when they express not wanting to undergo KRT.