Talk to the Veterans Crisis Line now
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government

VA Health Systems Research

Go to the VA ORD website
Go to the QUERI website

HSR Citation Abstract

Search | Search by Center | Search by Source | Keywords in Title

Integrating cognitive bias modification for pain and opioid cues into medication for opioid use disorder clinical care: Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary results.

MacLean RR, Heapy AA, Waters AJ, Wolkowicz N, Szollosy SK, Meyerovich J, Sofuoglu M. Integrating cognitive bias modification for pain and opioid cues into medication for opioid use disorder clinical care: Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary results. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2023 May 1; 246:109857.

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.
   Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions



Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Despite high co-occurrence, chronic pain is often unaddressed in treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) and little is known about mechanisms that may underlie associations between pain and opioid use. Using an attentional bias (AB) task with both pain and opioid cues, we evaluated a cognitive bias modification (CBM) task administered during regularly scheduled medications for OUD (mOUD) dosing visits. The current study evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of the CBM task. Outcomes for AB tasks used traditional mean-based score and trial-level bias scores (TLBS). METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized controlled trial, 28 individuals with OUD and chronic pain engaged in mOUD were randomized to either CBM or an AB control condition and completed up to three tasks per week for four weeks. Standard AB task was completed at baseline and post-treatment. Participants completed feasibility and acceptability measures, and preliminary efficacy (i.e., change in AB) was assessed using ANOVA models. RESULTS: Participants attended 83.3% of scheduled sessions and generally reported the task was enjoyable, credible, and easy to complete. Preliminary results demonstrated a condition by time interaction highlighting a reduction in AB in the CBM group but not the control group in opioid TLBS variability (F[1,26] = 5.01, p  = .034) and pain TLBS towards (F[1,26] = 6.42, p  = .018) and pain TLBS variability (F[1,26] = 5.24, p  =  .03). CONCLUSIONS: The current study supports integrating brief, computer-based tasks designed to reduce AB into mOUD clinical care. The preliminary results suggest that TLBS outcomes may be more sensitive to capture changes in AB; however, larger studies are required.





Questions about the HSR website? Email the Web Team

Any health information on this website is strictly for informational purposes and is not intended as medical advice. It should not be used to diagnose or treat any condition.