Evaluating the use of a recommender system for selecting optimal messages for smoking cessation: patterns and effects of user-system engagement.

Chen J, Houston TK, Faro JM, Nagawa CS, Orvek EA, Blok AC, Allison JJ, Person SD, Smith BM, Sadasivam RS. Evaluating the use of a recommender system for selecting optimal messages for smoking cessation: patterns and effects of user-system engagement. BMC public health. 2021 Sep 26; 21(1):1749.

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.    Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions

Search for Abstract from PubMed

---

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Motivational messaging is a frequently used digital intervention to promote positive health behavior changes, including smoking cessation. Typically, motivational messaging systems have not actively sought feedback on each message, preventing a closer examination of the user-system engagement. This study assessed the granular user-system engagement around a recommender system (a new system that actively sought user feedback on each message to improve message selection) for promoting smoking cessation and the impact of engagement on cessation outcome. METHODS: We prospectively followed a cohort of current smokers enrolled to use the recommender system for 6?months. The system sent participants motivational messages to support smoking cessation every 3?days and used machine learning to incorporate user feedback (i.e., user''s rating on the perceived influence of each message, collected on a 5-point Likert scale with 1 indicating strong disagreement and 5 indicating strong agreement on perceiving the influence on quitting smoking) to improve the selection of the following message. We assessed user-system engagement by various metrics, including user response rate (i.e., the percent of times a user rated the messages) and the perceived influence of messages. We compared retention rates across different levels of user-system engagement and assessed the association between engagement and the 7-day point prevalence abstinence (missing outcome? = smoking) by using multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 731 participants (13% Black; 73% women). The user response rate was 0.24 (SD? = 0.34) and user-perceived influence was 3.76 (SD? = 0.84). The retention rate positively increased with the user response rate (trend test P  < 0.001). Compared with non-response, six-month cessation increased with the levels of response rates: low response rate (odds ratio [OR]? = 1.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07-3.23), moderate response rate (OR? = 2.30, 95% CI: 1.36-3.88), high response rate (OR? = 2.69, 95% CI: 1.58-4.58). The association between perceived message influence and the outcome showed a similar pattern. CONCLUSIONS: High user-system engagement was positively associated with both high retention rate and smoking cessation, suggesting that investigation of methods to increase engagement may be crucial to increase the impact of the recommender system for smoking cessation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration Identifier: NCT03224520 . Registration date: July 21, 2017.