Models solely using claims-based administrative data are poor predictors of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity.

Sauer BC, Teng CC, Accortt NA, Burningham Z, Collier D, Trivedi M, Cannon GW. Models solely using claims-based administrative data are poor predictors of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Arthritis Research & Therapy. 2017 May 8; 19(1):86.

Related HSR&D Project(s)

• CRE 12-312 – Information Extraction and Visualization Toolkit (IE-Viz)

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.    Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions

Search for Abstract from PubMed

---

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: This study developed and validated a claims-based statistical model to predict rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity, measured by the 28-joint count Disease Activity Score (DAS28). METHOD: Veterans enrolled in the Veterans Affairs Rheumatoid Arthritis (VARA) registry with one year of data available for review before being assessed by the DAS28, were studied. Three models were developed based on initial selection of variables for analyses. The first model was based on clinically defined variables, the second leveraged grouping systems for high dimensional data and the third approach prescreened all possible predictors based on a significant bivariate association with the DAS28. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) with fivefold cross-validation was used for variable selection and model development. Models were also compared for patients with < 5 years to those = 5 years of RA disease. Classification accuracy was examined for remission (DAS28? < 2.6) and for low (2.6-3.1), moderate (3.2-5.1) and high ( > 5.1) activity. RESULTS: There were 1582 Veterans who fulfilled inclusion criteria. The adjusted r-square for the three models tested ranged from 0.221 to 0.223. The models performed slightly better for patients with < 5 years of RA disease than for patients with = 5 years of RA disease. Correct classification of DAS28 categories ranged from 39.9% to 40.5% for the three models. CONCLUSION: The multiple models tested showed weak overall predictive accuracy in measuring DAS28. The models performed poorly at predicting patients with remission and high disease activity. Future research should investigate components of disease activity measures directly from medical records and incorporate additional laboratory and other clinical data.