Talk to the Veterans Crisis Line now
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government

VA Health Systems Research

Go to the VA ORD website
Go to the QUERI website

Registered Nurse Transition-to-Practice Programs: A Systematic Review

Click for list of published reports
Click for topic nomination form
Click for list of reports in progress

Registered Nurse Transition to Practice Programs: A Systematic Review.

Recommended citation:
Thies J, Higgins PS, Schlak AE, Begashaw MM, De Vries G, Miake-Lye IM. Registered Nurse Transition-to-Practice Programs: A Systematic Review. Washington, DC: Evidence Synthesis Program, Health Systems Research, Office of Research and Development, Department of Veterans Affairs. VA ESP Project #05-226; 2024.



Download PDF: Complete Report, Executive Summary, Report, Appendices

Takeaway

RN transition to practice programs (RNTTPs) that have been piloted and implemented in recent years deserve more rigorous evaluation to answer critical questions about their implementation and sustainment. Because RNTTPs are touted as potentially alleviating critical RN staffing shortages and supporting the development of the nursing workforce's future, the benefits of these programs should be documented, and best practices should be ascertained so they can be scaled and sustained.

Context

First-year registered nurses (RNs) have the highest turnover rate of all hospital-based RNs, and often face a myriad of challenges, despite having completed rigorous academic programs and extensive clinical experience. Comprehensive, multi-component RNTTPs can assist with becoming acquainted with the RN role and gaining an identity as a professional RN, which may help improve retention among new RNs. We conducted a systematic review of published evidence syntheses on RNTTPs, focusing on 2 key questions related to RNTTP effectiveness and characteristics of effective RNTTPs.

Key Findings

The systematic review literature search identified 140 potentially relevant reviews on RNTTPS. Nineteen were included in the final narrative synthesis. There was no seminal study or set of studies that all reviews included, and no single review that included the majority of identified original research studies. Most reviews were appraised as low or critically low overall confidence in the review results. Two reviews that were high or moderate confidence emphasized the methodological issues in the available evidence, and found that the best quality evidence, which used a mix of methodological approaches, indicated a connection between RNTTPs and increased critical thinking, competency, and retention. The evidence for program length was inconclusive, with published evidence syntheses suggesting similar lengths around 6-12 months.

See also

Registered Nurse Transition to Practice Programs: A Systematic Review (Management Brief)

Miake-Lye IM, Schlak AE, Thies J, Higgins P, Couig MP. A Landscape of Evidence on RN Transition to Practice Programs: A Systematic Review of Reviews. Medical Care. 2026; 64(1S). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002230.


Questions about the HSR website? Email the Web Team

Any health information on this website is strictly for informational purposes and is not intended as medical advice. It should not be used to diagnose or treat any condition.