Lack of timely follow-up of abnormal imaging results and radiologists' recommendations.

Al-Mutairi A, Meyer AN, Chang P, Singh H. Lack of timely follow-up of abnormal imaging results and radiologists' recommendations. Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR. 2015 Apr 1; 12(4):385-9.

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.    Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions

Search for Abstract from PubMed

---

Abstract:

PURPOSE: Abnormal imaging results may not always lead to timely follow-up. We tested whether certain aspects of communication in radiology reports influence the response of the referring providers, and hence follow-up on abnormal findings. METHODS: We focused on 2 communication-related items that we hypothesized could affect follow-up: expressions of doubt in the radiology report, and recommendations for further imaging. After institutional review board approval, we conducted a retrospective review of 250 outpatient radiology reports from a multispecialty ambulatory clinic of a tertiary-care Veterans Affairs facility. The selected studies included 92 cases confirmed to lack timely follow-up (ie, further tests or consultations, treatment, and/or communication to the patient within 4 weeks), as determined in a previous study. An additional 158 cases with documented timely follow-up served as controls. Doubt in the narrative was measured by the presence of key phrases (eg, "unable to exclude," "cannot exclude," "cannot rule out," "possibly," and "unlikely"), in the absence of which we used reviewer interpretation. A physician blinded to follow-up outcomes collected the data. RESULTS: Patients whose reports contained recommendations for further imaging were more likely to have been lost to follow-up at 4 weeks compared with patients without such recommendations (P  = .01). Language in the report suggestive of doubt did not affect the timeliness of follow-up (P  = .59). CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal imaging results with recommendations for additional imaging may be more vulnerable to lack of timely follow-up. Additional safeguards, such as tracking systems, should be developed to prevent failure to follow up on such results.