Effects of a Home-Based Telephone-Supported Physical Activity Program for Older Adult Veterans With Chronic Low Back Pain.

Goode AP, Taylor SS, Hastings SN, Stanwyck C, Coffman CJ, Allen KD. Effects of a Home-Based Telephone-Supported Physical Activity Program for Older Adult Veterans With Chronic Low Back Pain. Physical Therapy. 2018 May 1; 98(5):369-380.

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.    Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions

Search for Abstract from PubMed

---

Abstract:

Background: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is highly prevalent in older adults, leading to functional decline. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate physical activity (PA) only and PA plus cognitive-behavioral therapy for pain (CBT-P) among older adult veterans with CLBP. Design: This study was a pilot randomized trial comparing a 12-week telephone-supported PA-only intervention group (PA group) or PA plus CBT-P intervention group (PA + CBT-P group) and a wait-list control group (WL group). Setting: The study setting was the Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System. Participants: The study participants were 60 older adults with CLBP. Interventions: The PA intervention included stretching, strengthening, and aerobic activities; CBT-P covered activity pacing, relaxation techniques, and cognitive restructuring. Measurements: Feasibility measures included enrollment and completion metrics; acceptability was measured by completed phone calls. Primary outcomes included the Timed "Up and Go" Test and the PROMIS Health Assessment Questionnaire. Generalized linear mixed models were used to estimate changes within and between groups. Effect sizes were calculated with the Cohen d. Adverse effects were measured by self-report. Results: The mean participant age was 70.3 years; 53% were not white, and 93% were men. Eighty-three percent of participants completed the study, and the mean number of completed phone calls was 10 (of 13). Compared with the results for the WL group, small to medium treatment effects were found for the intervention groups in the Timed "Up and Go" Test (PA group: -2.94 [95% CI  =  -6.24 to 0.35], effect size  =  -0.28; PA + CBT-P group: -3.26 [95% CI  =  -6.69 to 0.18], effect size  =  -0.31) and the PROMIS Health Assessment Questionnaire (PA group: -6.11 [95% CI  =  -12.85 to 0.64], effect size  =  -0.64; PA + CBT-P group: -4.10 [95% CI  =  -11.69 to 3.48], effect size  =  -0.43). Small treatment effects favored PA over PA + CBT-P. No adverse effects were noted. Limitations: This was a pilot study, and a larger study is needed to verify the results. Conclusions: This pilot trial demonstrated that home-based telephone-supported PA interventions were feasible, acceptable, and safe for older adult veterans. The results provide support for a larger trial investigating these interventions.